SYSTEM LEVEL THEORIES OF CONFLICT


I. REALISM (also called Realpolitik, Power Politics)

ASSUMPTIONS/OBSERVATIONS:

1. Human Nature makes people self-interested ("inherent dark side")

2. The International System has a legal/authority structure of ANARCHY--it consists of sovereign states and has NO CENTRAL AUTHORITY, or no higher authority above the state.

3. States can be thought of as unitary rational actors who pursue their self-interest (i.e., you can think of them as a single person--like "Washington" or "Moscow")

5. POWER, especially military power, is crucial in determining outcomes of conflict and war


Therefore,

8. So, conflict and war are inevitable in the long run due to the anarchy of the system as well as human nature.



PRESCRIPTIONS: What should states do?

1. States should increase or maintain their power

--each state must guarantee its own security--"self-help"

--security is best maintained by defense spending, alliances, and dividing one's enemies

2. Avoid a short term power loss

--only expend significant resources if vital national interests are at stake

3. Be ethical, but if forced to choose between Ethics and Power, choose Power

--"do good only if the price is low"


To Achieve Peace, States should:

4. DETER WAR by building your own power

5. Promote BALANCES OF POWER, both regional and global, to deter war. This means that you act to keep any single state or coalition from becoming so powerful either regionally or globally that it can dominate others states in the system.

6. Use Diplomacy and International Law to make conflict less frequent and less violent

7. But remember, war is inevitable in the long run.



SOME BASIC IMPLICATIONS

1. Domestic Politics, Ideology, Leadership, and other state-level factors do not matter much in international affairs-realists pay attention to a state's power and the balance of power.

2. High politics (military issues) are more important than low politics (economics, environment)



REALIST SLOGANS:

    "The enemy of my enemy is my friend."

    "The world is a dangerous place."

 

II. IDEALISM (Also called Liberalism or Globalism)

This theory is more prescriptive than realism, and is largely a critique of realist theory. Rather than telling us how states will act, it focuses on how they should act to create a more peaceful world.


ASSUMPTIONS/OBSERVATIONS

1. Human nature is not so bad, and it does not condemn us to violence and war.

2. The Anarchic structure of the international system is the root cause of war.

3. Ethics, Ideology, Leaders, and Form of government DO matter--How a country treats its own citizens tells us a lot about how aggressive it will be in the international arena


TO ACHIEVE PEACE, treat the cause, not the symptoms:

1. REDUCE INTERNATIONAL ANARCHY by creating MORE CENTRAL COORDINATION in the international system (not the "world government" that some fear!). States need to pursue policies that reduce the security dilemma caused by the anarchic legal structure of the system. This creates the basis for long term peace.



To accomplish this, there are three basic methods--

A) INCREASE INTERDEPENDENCE among states

B) STRENGTHEN THE RULE OF LAW

C) SUPPORT DEMOCRACY

    -Join international organizations and alliances

    -increase trade

    -increase interaction through cultural exchanges, tourism



B. -Use International Law and COLLECTIVE SECURITY to deter wars and punish aggressors

-Support HUMAN RIGHTS, which protects individuals against abuses by sovereign states

-Avoid the unilateral use of force against other states

-In general, use ethical means to carry out foreign policy. Be ethical even if it seems to hurt your state's power in the short run--it will help create a more just and peaceful world in the long run

IDEALIST SLOGANS:

   "Build community."

 

Back to Marc's Home Page

Back to Political Science