Erin's letter

**

Date: Thurs, 6 January 2000 07:32:21 -0400

Subject: Re: Questions for Joe

From: eringh@uw.edu

To: mepstein@aol.com

Mime-version: 1.0

X-priority: 3

 

Mark,

I tried writing it as fiction. It must be awful to read, -- esp. where I tried to make it dramatic. And these weirdos mCarthy, Carson, yuck.-- then Jo G. Liddy, even worse = self-absorbed me-bop gone way wrong + all my own BB-sob-bop to make things worse!. I certainly got bogged down in that fight with Jo’s uncle -- Moods I was in. --

--and so much of it!! of course i don't expect you to read it. As you say, we write to understand and be understood. To love and be loved. But -- like the first one, -- I cannot not send it. Maybe through all this we've invented a new form of psychotherapy.

The metaphors started driving me crazy. Thank god I didn't think of duck tape ‘til just now. The point is simply that Yeats was wrong. Things fall apart but the center holds! Or rather, it can hold if the center is knowing and pure = empty. Too bad we didn't think of that the day we were talking about titles..

I’ve been piddling with all this for a couple of years on weekends, whenver I got some time. I came up here to the cabin for two weeks over the new year; and now it is time just to mail it to you.

Woke up this morning, or rather its just midnight, but I got some good sleep -- and realized something obvious: In the very act of writing this, I have been going into the center of the mandala, with confidence --combining sensuality and spiritual obviously doesn't have to mean just sex. (but I'm enough like Zo with her blind spots to assume that!!) Thinking/imagining are sensual. Call it what you want. The free play of awareness with thoughts and images: not keeping it separate. And in a way that sort of play is wholly appropriate in the context of my rather abstract personal relationships spanning space and time, I mean, in a way not incorporated so well into the physical: certainly not disappearing, yet not talking or seeing you or other friends very often for the past few years. An email now and then. Of course that suits me all too well. I am usually alone, even in the city, and day to day have few intense personal relationships of any type. But up here I have come to see that my life is absolutely rich in an abstract way, meaning first there are many many people in it even if at some distance. I could name you all, and there are many to name, including my past lovers; of course I always got along best with lovers who were in the past. Or in a distant city. Your message to Jo is why not even be free enough to let the whole body in, in a regular way, here and now. I do it in both meditating and dancing but both can be a bit staged in their own ways.

Anyway I made some notes about this.

ƒ=> /erinNotes

they go on and on, but let me know what you think.

I definitely learned this from Jo: periods of solitude (which she thought she valued and was so confident about) had always been cluttered and organized by retreat type schedules and expectations and so forth. She was never free from them. When you wrote that intimacy and solitude go hand in hand, I immediately assumed: look! I don't have a problem being intimate because I do solitude so well. Yet in fact I often have used the intensively structured solitude, always going straight to that, as a shield against just being alone -- a type of premature withdrawal from intense solitude, by planning things so more or less I'd know what to expect. This time I didn't even cling to that. (The obvious next thought, which only very faintly can I formulate in a quiet back of my mind, is that there might be ways of relating, also not so cluttered by thoughts ... )

Talked with Joseph two nights ago. I think he'd prefer a bigger part in the story. He made the channelling suggestion himself. Actually I've concluded he is Joe, it isn't really me after all, and indeed you used the name Joe to guarantee nobody would think you were talking about him, esp. after mentioning him explicitly in the book in the story about the Roshi helping make accessible his own "childhood emptiness" (25).. (like the Nabakovian Joe Carson Zoe imagined, not like the one who placed the ad: the Carson here is so dense he thinks he's Joe because, well he is Joe!)

I realize I never did get to the questions you gave me. well, I do digress -- do I not? .. though I thought Carson did pretty well with #1. :) I've just kept waiting until I was more clear or whatever. To some extent I am copping out. Yet I recall your story that ends

Like a child whose mind is free to roam because he is secure in his mother's presence, I completely let down my guard. I had the awareness of just how unimportant my efforts to understand myself were. (172)

And anyway me-bop gets boring fast!-- and then other things, like the kids, kept seeming more important and more interesting than figuring it all out. And Erin, me -- Erin, who .. as time went by, this didn't come out in the story, but I was worried about this... got more and more like the woman weeping in Zoe's arms: lets suppose she didn't get her act together really. Daily life swept her away. Life is too amazing to let slip away, even when what we are doing is trying to be helpful. Slowing the flood isn't a matter of analysis or figuring things out. Much simpler than that. There is so much beauty within us and around us. The key is renunciation (not = self denial!!!).

Anyway I want you to know that I still do not buy your stay-at-home complacency. You and Jack Kornfield and others sketch a beautiful magnificent vision of integrated spirituality and sensuality and family life and etc etc. I agree it is beautiful.

But, Mark, real life has such jagged edges. More fundamental than the details what happens or not in my life is that it appears as if out of nowhere, and it ends. Quickly enough, I will be just plain dead and gone.

Meanwhile there are millions and millions of people and other beings struggling in the most basic ways, for food, for a tiny measure of security, for freedom. My own happiness or not is connectd to those struggles, --because I am aware. This is not something to start feeling guilty about.

If I pretend my life is not connected, that I somehow am exempt and separate --and how desparately I would like that to be so, but it cannot be so, to suppose it is so is only pretense-- & then I get dull, stuck. Whether blissful romance and stimulating conversation, nourishing food and aromatic massage oils, not to mention all the positions etc --whether I wake up in the morning to a nice day filled up with stuff like that or --on the other extreme, if I wake up to another dirty day of being tortured, say, for speaking against an oppressive government, --the challenge either way is not to hold on to it. --Of course I can’t really speak about being tortured. But I know that torture is happening, right now somewhere, and that fact is part of my life. And it is being endured or not. That person is part of my life. And of course there are shades and shades of suffering. nobody turns out exempt at all, in the least. We might have a vision of life getting easier as we mature, as we pay our dues --but that is fantasy too.

--Do I embrace these facts then?

--Yes? --If so, then that means renunciation, cold and hard; for I just can’t cling to the situation of comfort, security, bliss, etc. which, I know, gives me the time right now to sit here looking out the window. --And so? So: --not to hold on, then. It will change quickly enough on its own, anyway, and even not having been tortured myself, and having lived in comfort and security, nonetheless quite very soon my head will rot.

In my opinion, the whole image and idea of wholeness works against actually being whole. Going to pieces=falling apart= being whole. I must say, Mark, the more I think about it the more irritated I get with your hype, the way you’re preaching to me about getting married etc as if the the model of romantic love is somehow etched into the fabric of human happiness.-- No, baby, not quite. Renunciation is way way more central than romance.

--And it seems to me I’m not saying all this merely because I can’t get through the mandala doorways to cozy up with the Goddess and Her Consort. Indeed, Sir, I would like to draw your attention to the campsite in the Cascade Mountains, on the 3d night when I did it. I crawled right into the tent with The Goddess and Her inimitable extraterrestrial consort Joe Carson.!!!!

True, he fell asleep and snored while we just talked. I couldn’t quite ge3t it on. So--uh, now wait a minute --you say that Joe can’t get past the half animal half female figures? He can’t get to that place where the couple is lovingly entwined in the center of the mandala. --Mark, you were saying he needs to get in there with them, right?? :) So I did understand you correctly, then, to be suggesting a threesome!!?? That finally is the answer??! ==Do you have pictures?

  • :)

  • Oh well.-- I know about two cents worth about all this.--

    It’s love’s illusions I recall.

    --I must admit the idea of being alone in the tent with Carson is still quite scary !!

    --So in any case it has been an interesting week, after a week of intensive retreat here at the cabin. I took this second week to look at what I wrote last fall and the questions you sent me. During the retreat no writing, no books--only one evening a litchfield tape picked at random. The talk was somewhat muffled so I could not get many words but every now and then I could hear Danny and Sharon laughing, which helped a lot.

    I just have to stop now. I mean really stop, this time, --and go. Miles to go before I sleep. should have left four days ago. have been most derelict. Kept snowing deeper every day. i'll have to dig my car out. assuming i can find it. I will look forward to seeing you some time this year, not sure when. Its going to be a busy one.

    with love and gratitude,

    E.

    p.s. happy new year!!!!! by the way. Jeff and Beverly stopped by on New Year’s eve and dragged me over to their house. They have electricity and a tv and it stayed on so we knew everything was going ok into 2K. I felt relieved even thought I had not even realzized I had been a littled worried about a Y2K meltdown. The Eiffel Tower fireworks were magnificnet-- best thing ever seen on tv except, of course, for McGwire’s 62d home run.--

    The sparkly Eiffel Tower reminded me of nothing less than the body of a sitting meditator at certain times, central nervous system crackling and firing all over!

    Their 13-year old daughter Emily made a strange orange dessert out of orange sherbert and orange jello and mandarin oranges and other orange substances. -- brought to mind the first time I realized that things have names, the difference between thoughts and things --was when, as a 5-year old girl, I encountered that strange word = orange.

    We ate it after midnight. Unlike sherbert it doesn’t melt on your tongue, but unlike jello it doesn’t slide down your throat either. So it just sits there petulantly, calling for your attention until you chew it for awhile. So you chew it for awhile but the more you chew it the less it changes!!!--

    -- Looks like it could be an interesting millenium!!--

  • :)

  • p.p.s. later. This will amuse you. My car is quite absolutely stuck. I thought i was just making that up.. I'm trying to get a tow truck. So how do tow trucks fit in?? = You are stuck and someone comes along and helps -- helps pull you out. People like you. -- Like R.

    --The End.--

    **

    Dr. Mark Epstein

    Psychiatrist and Author

    of Going to Pieces without Falling Apart

    (the book about Joe)

     

    Dear Helen:

    I Have to tuype, can't write, sprained my hand -- sporry about hte typs -- swing dancing!. Yes we decided to try it out. more dangerous than I thought..

    This ists from a friend of mine. thought she would give fiction a trythis time. If you like it, please help us get it published. If not just return the manuscript to me. Might boost the sales of my book. publicity migght help Tricycle too.

    Either way I'm sure I can rely on you to keep this confidential. Edit it or have it edited any way you wish. Kate Wheeler would be perfect/ she is familiar with this territory.. I have no interest in working on it further. And would be interested in seeing what a talented writer might do with it. Maybe call it something like

    Channelling Made Easy

    by Joe Goldstein

    [better get his permission :)

    I might write a forward for it. In any case Zoe will be the topic of my twenty-third book, and if this comes out it might help sell that book too.

    Please set up an account with the Buddhist Peace Fellowship if the book succeeds.

    how do you like my new stationery? got a new printer too.

    Mark

    Continue with Violet (Shantila's letter to Z. Mulder) next>>>

    use web browser to go back<<

    return to homepage The Z-Files